From New Year’s Resolution to Tuesday’s Practice: Why Journaling Helps Change Stick

Watercolor garden showing seeds, seedlings, raised beds, flowers, and climbing vines

November 2, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

On January 2, I can make a resolution with the confidence of a man who has not yet met his February calendar. “I will be more patient,” I write in my head, as though patience were a software update scheduled to install overnight.

There is nothing wrong with a New Year’s resolution. It names a hope. The trouble is that a hope can stay beautifully vague. A journal gives that hope somewhere to meet Tuesday.

Researchers who reviewed 138 experiments involving nearly 20,000 people found that interventions encouraging people to monitor their progress also helped them attain their goals. The average effect on goal attainment was meaningful but not magical. Effects were larger when people physically recorded their progress or reported it to someone. That is not proof that any notebook can remake a life. It is a good reason to make the next step visible. (Harkin and colleagues’ 2016 meta-analysis.)

Even research focused on resolutions is more generous than the familiar joke that everyone quits by February. In a Swedish study of 1,066 participants, 55% of those who responded at one year considered themselves successful in sustaining their resolution. People with approach-oriented goals—moving toward something they wanted, rather than only away from something they disliked—reported more success. The study relied on self-reports, and it did not test journaling as a standalone cure. Still, it suggests that a resolution can be a beginning, not a punchline. (Oscarsson and colleagues’ study.)

So what might a journal add? Not a courtroom transcript of every mistake. More like a small, honest examen: What happened today? What helped or got in the way? What is one next step I can actually take tomorrow? Five lines can be enough. If I snapped at my kid, the page need not declare me a failure. It can help me notice that I was hungry, late, and answering a work message at the table. That is not an excuse; it is information I can use.

Character changes in ordinary repetitions: pausing before replying, putting the phone down, keeping one small promise. A journal does not perform those acts for us. It can help us see the pattern, remember why the pattern matters, and choose a next move small enough to begin. The page is a mirror, not a parole officer.

What happened? We made a promise to our future selves. What might it mean? Change gets sturdier when we notice our real days, not just our ideal January. What can we carry forward? Put a notebook beside the coffee mug and write three short lines tonight: one thing you tried, one thing you learned, and one thing to practice tomorrow. No fireworks required. The kettle is quite capable of making enough noise.

The Courage to Sound Bad: Learning an Instrument Later in Life

Musician playing cello while reading sheet music at home

October 28, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

Learning an instrument as an adult begins with a small indignity: the song in your head is playing in a different room from the notes under your fingers. You mean to strike a graceful chord. Instead, one finger arrives late, another takes a personal day, and the piano politely records the incident. It is a fine lesson in humility before the first scale is finished.

A beginner’s instrument is not a test of whether we are naturally gifted. It is a place where impatience becomes audible. The fingers need repetition; the ear needs time; our pride would like a certificate by Thursday. Learning later in life asks us to be comfortable being visibly unfinished.

Research gives that ordinary work a useful, unsensational context. In a year-long study, 156 healthy retirees ages 64 to 76, with little prior musical practice, took part in piano-practice sessions or music-culture classes. Piano learners improved in some measured skills, including articulation and timing on scale exercises, while other measures did not clearly change. Not every part of playing rose together. That is encouraging in its own way: progress can be real without being tidy. The study’s authors found that older beginners could acquire new musical skills, even as their progress varied from one ability to another.

That unevenness is familiar outside the music room. We repeat a passage, miss the same note, slow down, and try again. The humility is not saying, “I’ll never be any good.” That is just discouragement wearing a sensible hat. Humility is admitting, “I’m a beginner here,” and staying curious enough to notice what one careful repetition changes.

There is a difference between repetition and a grind. Repetition pays attention. It asks us to return to the same small stretch of music and listen: Was the rhythm steadier? Did my hand relax? Can I keep the left hand moving while the right one catches up? The answer might be no today. That is information, not a verdict.

A separate four-year follow-up tracked 32 older adults after an initial melodica program. Those who chose to continue practicing had better preservation of verbal working memory than those who stopped, though the groups were not randomly assigned, so the finding cannot prove that practice caused the difference. It is a careful hint, not a magic promise. The researchers describe both the association and the limits of what their small study can establish.

So maybe the gift of learning music late is not a sudden burst of talent. It is the chance to meet ourselves at the scale: a little awkward, a little amused, willing to begin again. Pick one short passage. Practice it slowly for five minutes. Notice one thing that changed, however modestly.

What happened? A note went sideways. What did it mean? I am still learning. What can I carry forward? I do not have to wait until I am good to begin; I only have to be willing to listen, repeat, and return.

Nostalgia Is Not Escape: A Spiritual Practice of Remembering

Vintage record player, handwritten letters, plants, and books on a wooden desk

October 11, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

I have a small problem with the past: it keeps showing up in the present wearing my old clothes. A song from high school. The smell of rice cooking when everyone was still home. My father’s laugh before I understood how much I would miss it.

We call this nostalgia. For a long time, the word sounded like a warning label—sentimental, backward-looking, perhaps one step away from buying a decorative sign that says Good Vibes Only. But nostalgia can be more than an escape hatch. Used honestly, it can become a small spiritual practice: remembering where we have been so we can notice where we are.

That does not mean pretending the past was perfect. Nostalgia is not a courtroom in which every old year gets acquitted. It is closer to an examen of memory. We look back with affection and a little ache, asking: Who was there? What did I receive? What did I become?

Psychologists define nostalgia as “a sentimental longing for one’s past,” and the research is more interesting than the greeting-card version. In six experiments, researchers found that nostalgia can strengthen social connectedness—a sense of belonging and acceptance—and, through that connection, support self-continuity: the feeling that the person I was and the person I am are not complete strangers.

Another series of five studies, involving 1,074 participants, linked nostalgia with a stronger connection among past, present, and future selves. The authors also tested the relationship while accounting for rumination, which is different. Rumination circles the wound. Nostalgia, at its best, tells the larger story. The study’s findings suggest that remembering can help us build a coherent narrative rather than simply replay distress.

Here is the spiritual distinction I find useful: escape asks memory to remove me from today; remembrance asks memory to return me to today with deeper roots.

When I play an old song, I am not required to move back into 1987. Thank goodness. The hair alone would be an act of penance. I can let the song remind me of friendships, risks, and ordinary mercies. I can notice what endured. I can grieve what did not. I can send a message to someone who helped make that chapter good.

That is why nostalgia can be communal rather than merely private. The American Psychological Association has noted that nostalgic memories often include the presence and support of family or friends, helping people feel connected across distance and loss. The point is not to worship the past. It is to receive its witnesses.

So, what happened? We remembered. What did it mean? The memory showed us that our lives are made of relationships, not just milestones. What can we carry forward? Perhaps one honest memory, held gently, then turned into gratitude or a phone call.

Try it tonight: choose one memory that still feels warm. Ask what it gave you, who shared it, and what it asks of you now. Then come back to the room you are in. Nostalgia should not be a door that locks behind us. It can be a window—open just long enough to let some light reach the present.

What Dad Jokes Know About Market Timing

Abstract financial chart with rising candlesticks and glowing orbital lines

October 6, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

I have a theory about dad jokes: they are less about being funny than about arriving at exactly the wrong—therefore right—moment.

My children can see one coming from three rooms away. I set up the question. I pause. I deliver the pun. They groan with the weary dignity of people who have been asked to inspect one more “dad joke” portfolio. And yet, if I tell it too early, it dies. Too late, and the room has moved on. The joke needs a little runway.

That is timing. Not stopwatch timing. Relational timing.

A joke works by asking the listener to build one interpretation, then nudging them into another. A 2023 study in Frontiers in Psychology describes this as a kind of incongruity-resolution process: the punchline changes the frame, and the mind has to catch up. The laugh is often the sound of that catch-up.

There is something humbling here for a man who once thought a well-timed joke meant simply waiting three seconds before the punchline. The real question is not, “Have I found the perfect delay?” It is, “Is this person ready for this turn?”

Markets ask a similar question, only with more zeros and fewer forgiving teenagers.

Every investor wants to buy before the good news and sell before the bad news. That is the financial version of landing the punchline before anyone has heard the setup. Sometimes it works. More often, the moment you think you have mastered the rhythm, the market changes the joke.

Vanguard notes that the best and worst market days tend to cluster closely together, which means an investor who steps out to avoid the bad days may also miss the rebound. In one Vanguard illustration, a $100,000 investment in a balanced 60/40 portfolio grew to $865,000 over roughly 28 years if it stayed invested; missing the 25 best days reduced ending wealth by about $520,000. The example assumes no fees, taxes, or additional cash flows, and it is not a promise about the future. It is a picture of how quickly “I’ll get back in later” can become a very expensive pause. Read the details in Vanguard’s analysis.

This does not mean every joke deserves a laugh, or every portfolio deserves blind loyalty. A dad joke can be kind, or it can be a hostage situation. A portfolio still needs a plan, diversification, and the occasional honest review. Vanguard’s separate market-timing guidance makes the narrower point: nobody reliably knows in advance which days will be the best or worst.

My fatherly lesson is therefore modest. Keep the setup. Know your audience. Leave room for the turn. In comedy, patience gives the other person a chance to arrive at the joke. In investing, patience gives your plan a chance to survive your mood.

What happened? A pun created a tiny surprise. What did it mean? Timing is less about control than attention. What can I carry forward? Before I reach for the perfect moment, I can ask whether a faithful, ordinary rhythm might be wiser.

And if that sounds like a joke, please wait three seconds before groaning.

The Song in the Prompt: What Suno Can Make—and What a Human Still Has to Mean

Editorial featured image for an article about Suno AI music generation and human creativity. Split composition: on the left, abstract code, algorithms, glowing waveform data, and digital audio controls; on the right, handwritten lyrics, a vintage microphone, and a human performer’s emotional creative presence. The two halves blend through colorful musical waveforms. Sophisticated, thought-provoking, album-cover-inspired, cinematic lighting, no readable text, landscape orientation.

September 29, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ 1 Comment

I made a song with Suno the other day. “Made” may be doing a little heavy lifting there. I typed a mood, a subject, and a few musical breadcrumbs; the machine handed me a finished track before I had time to locate my reading glasses.

That is Suno’s genuine trick. Its own how-to guide says a user can describe a genre, mood, instrumentation, tempo, or lyrics, and the system will generate a song with structure, instruments, and vocals. It returns two versions. You pick one, revise, extend, and try again. For the first ten minutes, it feels like having a very fast studio band that never asks whether you have paid the deposit.

And yet, “fast” is not the same as “deep.” Suno is excellent at turning a direction into an object. It can give you atmosphere, polish, and a surprisingly convincing chorus. It can help a stuck songwriter get unstuck. It can also produce the musical equivalent of a handsome hotel lobby: pleasant, competent, and hard to remember once you leave.

The human songwriter is doing something stranger. She is not merely arranging sounds. She is deciding which embarrassment to keep. Which line is too true. Which silence belongs before the chorus because that is where the father stopped calling, or the marriage ended, or the kid finally came home. A songwriter brings consequences to the room. The song is shaped not only by taste, but by a life that has had to live with its choices.

There is some evidence for this distinction, with an important asterisk. A 2026 MIT Media Lab report on a controlled study of 152 participants compared SunoAI tracks with music by human composers in calming and energizing settings. Human-composed music elicited the target emotions more effectively, even when listeners said they preferred the AI music. That is not a verdict on every song, or every listener. It is a useful reminder that liking a sound and being moved by it are not always the same thing.

There is another wrinkle. The U.S. Copyright Office’s January 2025 report says human authorship is required for copyright protection. Under current generally available technology, a prompt alone usually does not give a user enough control over the expressive elements to make that user the author of the output. Human-written lyrics, creative arrangement, and substantial edits can matter. Typing “make it sadder” 117 times is not, by itself, a songwriting apprenticeship.

So what happened? A machine made a very usable musical sketch. What did it mean? The sketch was not the same thing as a song with a history. What can we carry forward? Use the tool for speed, surprise, and play. Then bring the part no model can supply on command: attention to a particular life.

And before you release anything, check the rules. Suno’s rights-and-ownership guidance says free-plan songs are for personal, non-commercial use, while songs made while subscribed to Pro or Premier receive commercial-use rights; those rights are not automatically retroactive. The machine may be quick. The fine print, like a good bridge, deserves another listen.

The Dad Joke Lab: Why Puns Make the Brain Do a Little Rebuild

September 27, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

I have a theory about dad jokes: they are not failed attempts at comedy. They are tiny household experiments in how meaning gets made.

Take the classic: “I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.” You can feel the eye-roll arriving before the laugh. The joke begins in one frame—gravity, perhaps, a book that is compelling—and then the last phrase quietly swaps the frame. “Put down” means stop reading. It also means set something on a surface. The pun makes your mind hold both meanings, then asks one to step forward wearing a fake mustache.

That little stumble is the engine. Researchers often describe humor comprehension as a two-part dance: first, the brain detects an incongruity; then it resolves the mismatch by finding a workable interpretation. A 2017 fMRI study in Frontiers in Psychology describes the punch line as a re-comprehension of the setup, a small reinterpretation that can feel like an insight. In its sample of 24 participants, 75 percent reported experiencing insight when they understood the jokes. That is a modest study, not a decree from Mount Neuroscience, but it gives the dad joke a respectable job description.

Puns turn the volume up on this process because language is slippery by design. One sound can point to two words. One phrase can carry two routes. The brain has to keep the first route available long enough to notice that the punch line has opened a side door.

A study of 27 native Mandarin speakers, using jokes built around ambiguity, inference, and exaggeration, found that different joke mechanisms recruited partly different patterns of brain activity. The ambiguity jokes required readers to return to the language of the setup and construct another interpretation. That is exactly what a pun asks us to do, except usually with less fMRI equipment and more groaning at the dinner table. The study is here.

Another fMRI study, this one with 17 participants viewing visual puns and other cartoons, separated detecting an incongruity from resolving it. The researchers linked resolution to a left-sided network that included the temporo-parietal junction, inferior frontal gyrus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Translation into uncle-language: the laugh is not only in spotting that something is off. It is in finding the bridge back to sense. Read the PubMed summary.

This may be why a good pun feels briefly satisfying even when it is objectively terrible. The joke gives the mind a small problem, then lets it solve the problem without consequences. No quarterly earnings call. No family group-chat misunderstanding. Just “sole” becoming “soul,” and everyone gets to cross the little bridge together.

What happened? A sentence changed shape. What did it mean? Understanding often requires holding two possibilities before choosing the one that fits. What can we carry forward? Perhaps a little patience with confusion—our own and somebody else’s. Sometimes the mind is not lost. It is looking for the second meaning.

And if that sounds too serious, I have another one: I told my family I was going to write about puns. They said, “That’s a play on words.” I said, “Exactly.”

The Purple Thread: Prince, Faith, and the Funk of the 1980s

Rainy city street with pedestrians, umbrellas, streetlamps, and colorful reflections

September 27, 2026September 27, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

The Prompt Bank gave me a good one today: “Prince, faith, and funk: the spiritual undercurrent in 80s pop.” Which is a little like asking where the electricity is in a lightning storm. Still, let’s look.

Prince’s public image was all purple fog, guitar heroics, lace, and enough double meanings to keep a seminary ethics class busy until supper. But underneath the spectacle was a serious religious imagination. He was raised Seventh-day Adventist and later became a Jehovah’s Witness. As Religion News Service notes, faith was not a side room in his work; across nearly four decades, it kept wandering onto the main stage.

Take “I Would Die 4 U,” from Purple Rain (1984). It can play as a love song, but the lyrics also borrow the language of messiah, dove, conscience, forgiveness, and belief. That ambiguity is the point. Prince was not handing us a tidy tract with a guitar solo attached. He was letting desire and devotion argue in public, sometimes in the same verse. The song asks what kind of love can say, “I will carry this,” without pretending that carrying it will be easy.

The album itself helps explain why the spiritual current could hide in plain sight. The Library of Congress describes Purple Rain as a dense fusion of funk, synth-pop, soul, guitar-based rock, psychedelic color, and sensual lyricism. That mixture was not a failure to choose a lane. It was the lane. Prince made contradiction sound less like a problem to solve and more like a room large enough for a human being.

That matters because 1980s pop often treated spirituality as either a joke, a special effect, or a soft-focus chorus. Prince kept it messy. “1999” could dance through apocalypse. “Controversy” could put questions about God beside questions about identity. Later songs made the biblical references even harder to miss. A university-affiliated study of Prince’s faith journey describes a movement from the provocations of his early records toward a more explicit, disciplined religious practice. Not a straight line. More like a funk bass line: it circles, disappears, and then lands exactly where you forgot it was going.

I find that more honest than the usual conversion story. We like clean before-and-after narratives: wild artist becomes devout believer, end of film. Prince’s catalog resists that edit. The questions remain audible. What does the body owe the spirit? Can pleasure be examined without being despised? Can a person change without disowning every earlier self? His answers were not always comfortable, but they were alive.

What happened? An extraordinary 1980s pop career carried Christian language, apocalyptic imagery, gospel feeling, and sexual provocation in the same purple suitcase. What did it mean? Formation is rarely a clean genre. We are shaped by what we inherit, what we question, and what we keep trying to reconcile. What can we carry forward? Maybe this: when we examine a song, a habit, or a decade, we should listen for the question beneath the beat. Even the loudest music may be asking what kind of love can make us whole.

The Walkman Didn’t Just Carry Music. It Carried a Room.

Vintage cassette players, headphones, map, books, and coffee on a wooden desk

September 24, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

I remember the first time I put on headphones and discovered that the walk to the bus stop could have a soundtrack. The sidewalk was the same. The mailbox was still disappointingly ordinary. But the world had acquired a little interior.

That is the quiet revolution of the Sony Walkman. We usually remember it as a gadget from the 1980s: blue plastic, chunky buttons, a cassette turning behind a small window. But its deeper invention was not merely portable music. It was portable privacy.

The story starts with a practical request. Sony co-founder Masaru Ibuka wanted to listen to stereo music on an overseas flight without carrying a heavy recorder. Sony engineers modified a small Pressman device by removing its recording function and adding stereo circuitry. Sony’s own history of the project describes the prototype as a compact cassette player that could travel with you, rather than asking you to remain beside the living-room stereo.

Sony released the first model, the TPS-L2, in Japan on July 1, 1979. The initial run was only 30,000 units. That sounds like a cautious beginning, and it was. Yet those units sold out in less than three months. By April 1980, reported monthly production still could not keep up with demand; by the end of October 1982, more than 60 percent of 5.5 million shipped units had gone abroad. Nippon.com’s account of the early years shows a small experiment becoming a worldwide habit.

But why did people want it so badly? Because headphones changed the meaning of being in public. A bus, a station, or a walk through Manhattan could now contain a private room. The city did not have to become silent; it could be edited.

The Smithsonian’s history of the Walkman calls attention to this double edge. A personal stereo could calm a person, shape a mood, or make a long commute bearable. It could also look like a tiny “do not disturb” sign. People criticized the device for shutting out the world, while users experienced it as a modest form of autonomy. The same pair of headphones could be refuge or retreat, depending on the day. The Smithsonian’s cultural history also notes the social side: shared earbuds and mixtapes made private listening strangely communal.

That tension feels familiar now. We carry whole libraries in our phones, and earbuds have become punctuation marks for modern life. The Walkman did not invent the desire to escape. It made the escape mobile, visible, and available to ordinary people on an ordinary Tuesday.

What happened? A modified recorder became a new kind of personal stereo. What did it mean? Technology could give a person not just information or entertainment, but a small boundary around attention. What can we carry forward? Maybe the question is not whether we should tune out. It is whether we know what we are tuning toward — and whether, every so often, we are willing to press stop and hear the street again.

When MTV Taught a Generation to See

Retro collage of vinyl records, cassette tapes, radio dials, and dancing silhouettes

September 17, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

At 12:01 a.m. on August 1, 1981, a new cable channel introduced itself with a sentence that sounded half like a concert emcee and half like a dare: “Ladies and gentlemen, rock and roll.” Then came the Buggles’ “Video Killed the Radio Star.” Britannica records the moment as MTV’s debut, and the first music video ever broadcast on the channel.

The opening sequence had an almost comic amount of ambition: space imagery, a moon, an MTV flag. The little network wanted to make music feel like an event. It did not yet have the reach to match the drama. The initial broadcast was available only to a small number of cable households in New Jersey, and distribution was hard to come by. NPR’s account of the first 100 videos notes that plenty of music-industry people expected the idea to fail.

That is part of the charm of the first year. MTV was not yet a monument. It was a strange little experiment that asked a strange little question: what if a song did not merely sound like something, but looked like something?

Radio had already taught us to carry music around in our heads. MTV added faces, clothes, rooms, gestures, choreography, and story. The five original video jockeys—Martha Quinn, Nina Blackwood, Alan Hunter, J.J. Jackson, and Mark Goodman—did not just introduce songs. They helped make the channel feel like a place you could visit. The screen became a kind of hallway where music, fashion, and personality kept bumping into one another.

The effect was bigger than a new way to promote records. A Newcastle University history of MTV describes how heavy rotation made visual image central to mainstream pop. A hit single now arrived with a look: the lighting, the jacket, the dance, the fantasy of the artist’s life. A song could become a short film, a commercial, and a little piece of mythology at the same time.

That formed people. Not in the grand, sermon-on-the-mount sense. More like a daily drip. We learned what confidence looked like before we had language for it. We learned that reinvention might involve a haircut, a hallway, a leather jacket, or simply the nerve to appear on camera as someone new. Some of us also learned to confuse a polished image with a whole person. Formation is rarely pure; it is usually a bundle of gifts and distortions.

And MTV’s early visual imagination had real blind spots. The Smithsonian’s history notes that the channel’s rock-oriented programming featured very few Black artists in its early years, a limitation challenged publicly by David Bowie and others. A truthful nostalgia keeps the wonder and the omission in the same frame.

So, what happened? A tiny cable experiment made sight part of the song. What did it mean? For a generation, music became a visual language for identity, aspiration, and belonging. What can we carry forward? Notice what is teaching you to see—and remember that every image, however thrilling, is still only one angle on a human life.

Take On Me and the Courage to Leave the Panel

Woman beside comic motorcycle race labeled STARDUST RACING 77

September 15, 2026 ~ Rich Pascual ~ Leave a comment

There is a moment in a-ha’s “Take On Me” when the girl looks up from her coffee and realizes the comic-book hero is looking back. It is a wonderfully 1985 idea: romance as a portal, pencil lines as a doorway, and a chorus that sounds like somebody asking for one brave chance.

Then the video does something more interesting. It refuses to let the two worlds stay separate.

If you have somehow missed it, the video moves between live action and a black-and-white comic drawn in loose pencil. The technique is rotoscoping: filming movement, then drawing over the frames. The BBC’s account of the video’s making says animator Michael Patterson spent 16 weeks sketching roughly 3,000 drawings. That is not a weekend project. That is a small mountain of patient marks.

The official credits at Patterson and Reckinger’s site name Michael Patterson and Candace Reckinger as the animation directors. Their work gives the video its strange double vision: the comic feels more alive than the café, while the café feels safer than the comic. One world is exciting but dangerous. The other is ordinary but solid.

That tension is the whole song’s emotional engine. “Take On Me” is not just asking, “Do you like me?” It is asking, “Will you come with me, even though the place I’m inviting you into is unfinished?” The comic hero is literally sketched in. He has no polished edges. He is a possibility with a motorcycle.

And then comes the escape. The girl returns to the ordinary world, but the ordinary world has been altered. The strange thing has followed her home. Or perhaps she has learned to see the room differently. That is what longing often does. It does not simply make us dissatisfied with the present. It gives the present a second outline.

My favorite part is that the video does not treat reinvention as a clean makeover. There is no triumphant “new you” montage with suspiciously good lighting. The transition is messy. It involves fear, a torn page, and a person who has to decide whether the familiar world is still enough.

The song’s public life followed a similar path. Official Charts records a 19-week UK chart run, while the video became a defining example of how an ambitious visual could change a pop song’s reach. The band did not merely release a track; they built a doorway around it.

So what happened? A Norwegian band made a pop song and paired it with an unusually labor-intensive animated film. What did it mean? Millions of listeners were invited to believe that longing could be both frightening and creative. What can we carry forward? Maybe this: reinvention rarely begins with a finished plan. It begins with a line, then another, then the willingness to step through the panel before you know how the story ends.

What is one unfinished possibility you keep treating as if it needs to be polished before you can enter it?