The Riskiest Servant in the Bible Might Be the Hero You Forgot

Single coin buried in soil, light above

I always assumed the “bad guy” in the Parable of the Talents was obvious — the servant who buried his money in the ground, out of laziness. Then I actually sat with the text again in Matthew 25:14-30, and I noticed something I’d skipped for twenty years: the master doesn’t scold him for being lazy. He scolds him for being afraid.

“I knew you were a hard man,” the servant says, basically accusing his boss of being the kind of guy who’d fire you over a bad quarter. So he did the safest thing available — he buried the money, kept it exactly intact, and handed it back penny for penny. No loss. No embarrassment. No risk.

And that’s the servant who gets called “wicked and slothful.”

Here’s the part that stopped me mid-coffee: the two servants who doubled their money took real risk to do it. First-century “trading” wasn’t a savings account — it meant loaning capital, backing ventures, betting the harvest would come in. As The Catholic Herald points out, this parable isn’t really a finance seminar in disguise. It’s a parable about fear disguised as caution.

I think about this every time I explain to my kids why we don’t keep all our savings under the mattress — and also every time I catch myself doing the spiritual version of burying a talent. Not using a gift because someone might criticize it. Not writing the song, not sending the blog post, not saying the prayer out loud, because staying safe feels responsible.

Ray Stedman’s reading of this parable puts it plainly: the sin here isn’t losing money. It’s refusing to risk anything at all in service of something bigger than yourself.

That reframes stewardship for me. I used to think good stewardship meant protecting what I’ve been given — keep it safe, don’t waste it, hand it back in one piece. Turns out the parable’s definition of good stewardship is closer to the opposite: put it to work, accept that work carries risk, and trust the One who gave it to you in the first place.

What happened: I reread a parable I thought I already understood.

What it meant: the “safe” choice in the story wasn’t safe at all — it was the only choice that produced zero fruit.

What I’m carrying forward: the next time I feel the urge to bury something — a dollar, a talent, an idea — I want to ask whether I’m being prudent, or just scared with better branding.

(And if you’re the one in your family who still keeps cash in a coffee can — I see you. I’m not judging. I’m just going to gently suggest an index fund.)

Eyes on Autumn

Looking back to December 2005, I noticed the first post on the “Halo Halo Life” blog had a dead link for one of my photoblog entries.  A little research turns up that “LynnInTokyo“, the photographer for the piece had changed the terms of her copyright and disabled embedded links to her work.  To add to the tragedy, she had also lost control of her account which got hacked and three years of her photography work was lost.

The good news is that her site on Flickr is back up and the photo I originally referenced was one of the select few that she decided to restore.  I replaced the embedded link with a direct link to her photo page and also added a new embedded photo that could show on the blog post itself.

Autumn Fire on the Treetops
Autumn Fire on the Treetops

NEW In Flickr… Embedded photo linking has been upgraded.  I rushed into this and didn’t check if I could still retain the original embedded linking process which was much simpler than the script that we now have to paste within our page code.

Hyperspace Chewie!
Hyperspace Chewie!

This is the original embedded linking look.  Flickr used to generate the code automatically when an “Blog This” link was selected.  I like the new linking look and will convert as I go as the original method still seems to be honored by Flickr’s servers.  Either way, with attribution and observance of the photog’s copyright guidelines it seems possible to keep these older posts alive.  Ten years old!  Whoot!

It would be nice to slowly replace these photos with my own but it is nice to maintain a symbiotic ecosystem where I share an alternative use and interpretation of the visual works of other artists.

Untitled

Retelling the stories that bring people together.

Do you think that makes sense?  It tells us of your intentions.  Is it necessary that we weep?  No sir, I meant to include joy, relief, pain, grief, the pulling emotions of what reminds us as the planetside wanderers that we’re not alone.  In all the stories we like to tell and retell, the greatest character we enjoy telling of is ourselves.  So in your searches for intelligent lifeforms, don’t forget yourselves sapient ones; knowing and in the learning of ourselves the in ourselves we find our ails.  Loneliness it is.

We have one another, you know.

Tsk.  In the world we declare that we are connected, but I say jaded and discontent intentionentally… divided.  I say rage for that night under stars and works of fire.  Rage for the heart that struggles to bring things together.  In parts, we are nothing.  Apart meant for only tenants in little cages that captures our souls, entangled.